Here I am, banging on about abortion again. It’s almost like
I’m a progressive feminist or something, innit? Anyway, Ireland, not exactly
known as a safe haven of open-minded attitudes to reproductive rights, was in
the news last week (I know, I am behind, bad blogger) in the darkest way
possible. Normally things trend on Twitter for the fluffiest and harebrained of
reasons, but if you haven’t read the story already I advise you to spend some
time on the #Savita hashtag to get yourselves up to speed.
In simple terms, from what we know from the press coverage of the case, a 31 year old (married) woman (intentionally) pregnant for the
first time went to A&E at University Hospital, Galway presenting with back
pain. She was found to be miscarrying but her requests for a medical
termination were alledgedly denied by staff at the hospital as a foetal
heartbeat could still be detected. At one point it is alledged that she was
told, “this is a Catholic country”, by way of explanation for the non-intervention.
The dead foetus was removed once a heartbeat could no longer be found but on
the 28th October 2012, Savita Halappanavar died of septicaemia.
For a thorough and accesible historical overview of the
legal situation in Ireland I recommend this
as further reading. For a historical overview of what happens when you make
abortion illegal, read this, but be warned
it comes with a great big content warning as it contains very distressing and
disturbing imagery and content.
Now, there are small-scale arguments as to why Savita was
not given a termination on arrival at the hospital, principally driven by the
argument, which from an intellectual point of view I can understand, that doctors
might be fearful of losing their livelihood, of being struck off and so on,
given the current legal position on abortion in the country (see above). And
you know what? I hear that. Losing your job is pretty terrible, especially
given the global north’s current state of fiscal meltdown. But more terrible
than knowing that your intervention would likely have prevented a woman’s
death? I’m not so sure about that. But my contention with all of this isn’t
just at this level, but on a macro
scale.
The pro-life argument on a larger scale (i.e. devoid of
domestic legislation and divorced from individual experience) is usually that
human life, however we define that, begins at conception. Now, I am not going
to make a secret of the fact that I think that this is total garbage (and here
is a solid scientific explanation of why),
but that is a strongly-held belief and while I think it is moronic, I do understand it, as in I understand what
its supporters mean by it. So, fine. But here is the thing that I really, truly
do not understand. If you believe that a zygote, embryo or foetus is a human
life, and you also believe that an adult human is a human life, then the thing
that I need explained to me is why the first life trumps the rights of the
second. Why? I am not asking this to be facetious, I really just do not
understand. Because the argument that the foetus has equal rights with the
carrier doesn’t square with the argument that it also has greater rights. I’m
no mathematician, but even I can see that that equation just doesn’t work.
And it makes me so, so angry that women – actual human women
who are definitely alive and participating in their human lives – are still,
STILL dying over this issue – not just in some far-flung corner of the globe
where we all ‘know’ (or tell ourselves) that women’s rights and human rights
are backwards or non-existent, but here, HERE in the global north on the
doorstep of my country, the UK. It should make you angry, too. Because we seem
to be wholly prepared to get very fired up about the failed deportation of a
radical Muslim preacher who may very well be repellent but, y’know, has never actually been convicted of a crime
here, but we are strangely mute about the fact that a different religion has a
stranglehold not just over the reproductive rights but the actual right to life of half of its citizens. It is twenty fucking
twelve, people. How many more Savitas have to die to uphold the ‘sanctity’ of
life?
No comments:
Post a Comment